The general elections are once again just around the corner here in South Africa and as I do every four years, I go through a bit of an inner-struggle as to how or even if, I should make my voice heard on the big day. The
Bible is pretty clear when it uses words like ‘gospel’, ‘lord’, ‘savior’ and ‘king’,
words that were in there day, loaded with political meaning, that the Christ
and the kingdom that He was ushering in would not just serve as a better
version of previous kingdoms with improved ideologies; rather, it would provide
a complete alternative that ran counter to all other kingdoms. Unlike the kingdoms of the world, His kingdom
would not be concerned with material wealth or drunk with power, nor would it be associated with war, lying, greed or oppression.
Kingdom Conflict
Although we are told to live peaceably, pray for and
obey our world’s leaders as far as possible, Scripture often portrays the worlds
systems in a negative light, Paul said that our struggle is not against people but against rulers, the authorities, the dark powers in this world as well as
spiritual entities opposed to the will of God (Ephesians 6:12). John said that
the whole world lies under the control of Satan (1 John 5:19). Peter and the
author of Hebrews speak of us as citizens of a heavenly kingdom who are ‘foreigners’
and ‘exiles’ among the nations (Hebrews 11:13, 1 Peter 1:17, 2:11).
In the end Jesus was killed for treason (John 19:12), a charge laid against Paul as well (Act 17:5-8) and that was kind of the pattern that was set until the time of Constantine when the Roman Empire invited the church into its bed initiating a shift where the church stopped carrying its cross and exchanged it for a sword. To quote from Tobie’s blog over at Natural Church:
Secular governance is a type of temporal governance allowed and sanctioned by God for the sake of the nations during this dispensation while the spiritual aspect of God’s Kingdom is being established in the hearts of regenerate people. When you mix the two you give the church a type of power that it was never supposed to have, and you give the state a sense of spirituality that it was never supposed to have.
To
put it another way, you cannot marry light and darkness, you cannot serve two
masters. The church in Constantine’s time made the mistake and succumbed to the
temptation that Jesus had declined in the wilderness. When the church assumes
leadership of a kingdom recognizable by lines that have been drawn in the sand, it has forgotten its mission of establishing a kingdom that is neither here nor
there (Luke 17:21) but everywhere and in everyone who is under the lordship of
Christ regardless of their color, culture or location. Moreover, the kingdom of God cannot be established through the use of
power, it cannot be voted in democratically and it cannot maintain peace and
order through rules and regulations. This is the internal struggle that I
mentioned going through personally at the start of this post, it is the undesirable obligation to vote for the least ungodly candidate or party in order to minimize damage and hope
that some good may come of their unlikely victory.
Now
I am well aware that there are many parties selling themselves as Christian
parties and I mean no disrespect to them nor am I questioning their intentions
or motives. But I seriously wonder what a ‘Christian Party’ would look like
should one ever come into power. Will it look like Catholicism burning its
enemies at the stake or will it look like the early Protestants executing those
that they deemed to be heretics, both acting under the authority of the state? Maybe, and it is a very big maybe, they will pay more attention to the
teachings of Jesus and resist the appeal to exercise authority and control over
others (Matthew 20:25), perhaps they would dismantle the country’s military and
start practically loving those who call themselves their enemies (Matthew 5:44),
perhaps they would start sending food and water into countries who they have
bad relations with (Romans 12:20). Maybe one of the major policy shifts they
would make would be to close all prisons in the country and institute something
more in line with the restorative justice seen under the Mosaic Law where
offenders had to make right with those whom they had stolen from (see Exodus
21:28-36 for example)? Maybe they would make it illegal for banks to borrow
money to a citizen and charge interest on it (Deuteronomy 23:19-20)?
Conclusion
Someone
once wisely noted that if you mix church and politics who just end up with politics.
Yet the Bible seems to make a case for the existence of governments, serving a
function as God’s tool to protect people, punish evil doers, maintain order, collect
taxes and more (Romans 13). Yet the church should have eyes with a bigger
calling in view, we should be acting as ambassadors for a different kingdom and
telling people of a better way of doing things, we should be communicating a better way of living, we should be telling
them of a king that they can put their full trust in. This does not mean that
the church need be silent to the corruption, violence and social injustices of
governments. We are blessed to have had men like Martin Luther King who stood up
against racial injustice, men like William Wilberforce who played such a crucial role in
bringing slavery to an end in England and, more closer to home, Desmond Tutu
speaking of forgiveness and unity at a time when South Africa was transitioning
out of the apartheid era and everyone was fearing the worst. Let them inspire us to continue speaking out against
wars, against abortion and against those who are destroying the planet and
irresponsibly using up its resources. But let us use the tools given to us by
Christ and throw down those methods employed by the world.
I
will be heading out next week to cast my vote, but I will be voting with my
head rather than my Bible. Because in government I expect a party to rule
well in how they utilize the money they collect. I’m hoping that someone will
come in who provides more jobs and can improve the economy. I am hoping that
crime levels will decline and that corruption will finally be dealt with. I am
hoping that Eskom can find a way to keep our lights on 24 hours a day without
resorting to ridiculous price hikes for consumers. But I am not expecting the
government to share my Christian convictions or carry them out on our behalf.
How can they? They are responsible for building a nation unlike the global one
that we are called to advance. I cannot end off any better than in the eloquent words of Stanley
Hauerwas:
“The church does not exist to provide an
ethos for any other form of social organization, but stands as a political
alternative to every nation, witnessing to the kind of social life possible for
those that have been formed by the story of Christ.”
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteVery cool read. Thanks
ReplyDeleteThanks Ash! I'm glad to see you here and thrilled that you appreciated my ramblings.
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jon, I hope that you guys are keeping well? We should make a plan to see you sometime!
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDelete"But I am not expecting the government to share my Christian convictions or carry them out on our behalf. How can they? They are responsible for building a nation unlike the global one that we are called to advance."
I feel this is only half right. Of course we cannot expect our Governments to have our christian motivations. But the Kingdom of God is very concerned with wellbeing, freedom for captives, help for the poor, etc, and so should governments (in my opinion). It is a legitimate political view, not shared by everyone of course, that these things will indeed build a nation, and without them we don't have equality and justice, and without them, we are likely to have instability, less wealth, less wellbeing, etc.
It is right (as Hauerwas says) to see the Kingdom of God as standing apart from government, but I think it is also right to apply those Kingdom principles that bear on human flourishing to government. We have an election coming up in Australia, and I will be voting not for the narrow christian party which doesn't seem able to see much beyond sexual ethics, and voting for those who will care for the future of the world and its people (i.e. address climate change), and have a compassionate attitude towards Australia's indigenous peoples, the poor, refugees, etc.
Hi Eric. Yes you are right in that there is definite overlap in some areas and there will always be parties with policies that reflect our own values to a degree. My point though which I think you saw was simply that the goal posts are not the same for the church and the state, they may not even be playing on the same field and we need not try to fuse them as many people do.
ReplyDelete